Welcome back folks!
The last time I posted was about a week ago (week ago).
Since then, I’ve had the opportunity to read a little something something from
a woman by the name of Amy Devitt. Her article/book excerpt/whatever you want
to call it, argues the idea that educators should spend time teaching the
background and contexts of genres. The so-called “genres” Devitt mentions are
those specific to writing, discussions, and ideas that reserve a certain amount
of individuality when they are backed by critical thinking.
Most of the genres I encounter in my life appear to include some type of
literary analysis. In an academic setting like SDSU, this is expected. However,
at my job . . . just kidding I don’t have one. There’s no time when you’re an
Aztec for Life amirite? While I don’t do much analytical writing at my
internship, there is a genre that involves short-handed notes and symbols to
abbreviate lengthy words. Another very significant genre in my life and
probably all of yours is texting. I’m not quite sure if that can be considered
a genre, but I don’t see why not.
The presence of different genres makes so much sense. You just witnessed
an A-HA! moment.
Each genre is unique to the purpose it’s meant to serve. Por ejemplo,
majority of the writing in my classes at State requires me to provide some
evidence perfectly sandwiched between quotation marks. These quotes come from
things that talk about the thing I’m talking about. As tedious as this writing
is, I always find that I sound much smarter on paper than when I open my mouth.
At my internship (I intern at a physical therapy clinic), everything the
patient says and does must be recorded in a way that allows the physical
therapist to track progress without having to read a novel each time. can u evn
remember wat it was like b4 txtng? I can, but that’s beside the point. The
gibberish and absence of grammar used in text messaging condenses sentences to
a bare minimum for us to understand. I know a lot of people whose pet peeve is
when people don’t text in full sentences. I get it. People are practicing to
write incorrectly. It honestly doesn’t bother me as long as I know what you’re
trying to say. I’m not your English teacher or your daddy, so there’s really no
reason for me to tell you how to write your texts.
While Devitt mentions that some people see genres as an
obstruction to one’s creativity, she counters with how they can be used as
tools when a student decides to become engaged learners/thinkers. According to
Devitt, “Whether we use genres consciously in the classroom or not, the genres
we assign promote particular worldviews just as the topics we have them [students]
read about do” (page 339). As a student, I understand the fear teachers have
when working on a genre. The genre’s label automatically brings with it, a
specific set of rules and boundaries that deem what is and isn’t acceptable. Often,
teachers can only measure students’ understanding through a clearly organized
style of writing. The downside to this goes back to the loss of authenticity
from the student. They become caught up in following a format that fails to
explain the reason it must be written in that way. A few times in the text, she
brings up the oh so familiar five-paragraph essay format. It’s crazy to think
that we are constantly bombarded with thoughts and concepts that come from
people and places unknown to us.
![]() |
| My girl Amy Devitt |
While Devitt says that it’s important to teach about
the context of genres, she also states the problem that arises in attempting to
teach a genre in order for students to completely to understand it. Like
everything in life, it’s much more complex than we realize because, “If we
teach a genre explicitly, we will inevitably teach it incompletely, but
students will understand more about it than they would have if we had taught
them nothing about it at all” (page 341). There seems to be no winning here.
Teachers should teach genres, but there’s no way to teach all aspects of a
genre. This being the case, I agree that having a little knowledge on something
is better than not having any at all.
Personally, I don’t think any subject can be covered
completely. You gain bits and pieces of information as you come across that
subject at different times and places in your own life. That’s where your own
individuality and opinions are truly formed. Genres have a greater impact on
our lives than we think. It’s up to us to decide how much influence we want to
grant it.


Hi Erin!
ReplyDeleteTexting as a writing genre... I don't know why I didn't even think about it! Definitely had an "Ah-ha!" moment with that one. Texting is definitely a genre a lot of us can relate to, and although it isn't always done in the same format (complete sentences vs groups of words) it has its own ideologies and conveys a certain meaning that other writing genres don't. I also like how you bring up Devitt's point on the teaching of genres. While it is impossible to expost students to all the various types, as long as they get familiar with a few it still has positive effects. Can't wait to see your next posts!
Karishma Sharma
Yes--I think texts qualify as genre.
ReplyDeleteSigh. I hate texting. I hate writing complete ideas on my phone. I think that's my age showing.
I like your point that each of us has an option as to how much we want the genres to use influence us if we think critically about what they might be doing. The thing is--how much will we think critically? Especially if part of the goal is to teach us to think in certain ways, in essence, make us a particular type of person. EF